USPTO serial 86666031
PARSONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARSONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas N. Masters
DOUGLAS N MASTERS LOEB & LOEB LLP321 N CLARK STSTE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60654Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Golf equipment, namely, golf clubs, golf bags, head covers for golf clubs, golf club grips, golf club shafts, golf balls, golf gloves, golf tees, golf ball markers, divot repair tools, and golf bag covers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |