USPTO serial 86670800
VER-TEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VER-TEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmingdale, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo G. Lenna
LEO G LENNA SORELL LENNA & SCHMIDT LLP99 SMITHTOWN BYP FL 2HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-2521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Mattresses, mattress foundations, mattress toppers, pillows, back rest pillows, kids pillows, sleeping bags | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |