USPTO serial 86671178
UO UNITED OBJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UO UNITED OBJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanja Proehl
TANJA PROEHL GREER BURNS & CRAIN300 S WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606-6752UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras for analyzing the trajectory of golf balls; Cameras for analyzing golf swing; Hand held analyzing apparatus, namely, electronic sensor for measuring golf swings; Air pollution measuring devices, namely, electronic sensor for measuring air pollution; Air measuring apparatus, namely, electronic sensor for measuring air quality; Surveying apparatus and instruments, namely, level measuring machines; Surveying machines and instruments; Spectacles; Electronic detectors and alarms for finding lost cellphones and smart phones; USB rechargers; Battery compensation chargers; Portable battery rechargers; Insect-repelling device using ultrasonic wave and electromagnetic wave; Wireless indoor and outdoor speakers; Smart phone transmitting/receiving sound amplifiers; Smart phone speakers; Speaker units, namely, input/output sound; Audio and video receivers; Earphones; Earphones and headphones; Amplifiers; Cases for wireless phones; Adaptors for connecting telephones to hearing aids; Mobile phone cases; Application software for smart phone for use in database management and use in electronic storage of data; Computer software for use in the safeguarding of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; Computer firmware for use in the safeguarding of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; Blank USB flash drives; Computer cursor control devices, namely, computer mouse; Blank flash memories for magnetic storage and/or recording media of data; Magnetic pens; Personal digital assistant | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | Mini beam projectors, namely, laser light projectors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |