Drawing for DRIVN

USPTO serial 86671181

DRIVN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRIVN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Len Nannarone

LEN NANNARONE Nannarone Law Group78 Walnut Hill DrScituate, MA 02066-4464UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and downloadable computer software that gathers and analyzes data and metrics from communications between high school, college and pro sports athletes and coaching staffs to provide information on enhancing physical performanceACTIVE—
041gathering and analyzing data and metrics from communications between high school, college and pro sports athletes and coaching staffs to provide information on how to enhance an athlete's physical performanceACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that gathers and analyzes data and metrics from communications between high school, college and pro sports athletes and coaching staffs to provide information on enhancing physical performance; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software that gathers and analyzes data and metrics from communications between high school, college and pro sports athletes and coaching staffs to provide information on enhancing physical performanceACTIVE—
044Consulting services in the field of mental fitness, namely, gathering and analyzing data and metrics from communications between high school, college and pro sports athletes and coaching staffs to provide information on how to enhance an athlete's mental skillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 23, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance