Drawing for CULTUREMAP

USPTO serial 86671537

CULTUREMAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CULTUREMAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara J. Lipshutz

BARBARA J. LIPSHUTZ JACOBS & BURLEIGH LLP1270 Avenue of the Americas7th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10020

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about a wide variety of subjects accessible by means of RADIO, TELEVISION, SATELLITE, AUDIO, VIDEO, WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS, MOBILE PHONE APPLICATIONS, AND COMPUTER NETWORKS; Entertainment services in the nature of creation, development, and production of television programming; Entertainment services, namely, providing ongoing television programs in the field of a wide variety of topics via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing ongoing webisodes featuring a wide variety of topics via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of a wide variety of topics; Entertainment services, namely, providing video podcasts in the field of a wide variety of topicsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 18, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 17, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 31, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 30, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 19, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance