Drawing for TRAKK

USPTO serial 86671850

TRAKK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CANTONE, KERI H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAKK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418

JERALD E. NAGAE Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 3RD AVE STE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101-3268UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044An online portal, through which the daily health, wellness, fitness, exercise, diet and nutrition habits and practices of individuals can be obtained, reviewed and assessed, and as a result recommendations and offers for services on improving the health, wellness, fitness, exercise, diet and nutrition habits and practices of individuals can be providedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 18, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 15, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 13, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance