Drawing for CULTUREMAP

USPTO serial 86671995

CULTUREMAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CULTUREMAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara J. Lipshutz

BARBARA J. LIPSHUTZ JACOBS & BURLEIGH LLP1270 Avenue of the Americas7th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10020

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of art, literature, music, TV and motion pictures, politics, history, crafts and hobbies, cultural studies, drama, natural history, philosophy, and travel; providing a website for entertainment purposes featuring video about art, literature, music, TV and motion pictures, politics, history, crafts and hobbies, cultural studies, drama, natural history, philosophy, and travelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 26, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 26, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 18, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 15, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 20, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 21, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 20, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 25, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 15, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 15, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 15, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 15, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance