USPTO serial 86672018
JEAN & LEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JEAN & LEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
JAMES R MENKER Holley & Menker PaPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233-1715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Laundry detergents, stain removers in the nature of oxygen brighteners, fabric softeners, dishwashing liquid preparations, all-purpose surface cleaners, scented fabric refresher sprays, stain remover, fruit and vegetable wash; air fragrancing preparations in the nature of air fresheners, baby bottle dishwashing liquid preparations, cleaner for use on toys; body care products, namely shampoos, hair conditioners, skin conditioners, body wash, bubble bath, body oils, body lotions, bar soaps for hands, body bar soaps, body scrubs, facial scrubs, day creams, night creams, moisturizers, namely, facial moisturizers, skin moisturizers, hand moisturizers, anti-aging moisturizers, after sun moisturizers, moisturizing body lotions, moisturizing creams and moisturizing milks, make-up remover lotions, make-up remover wipes, make-up, cosmetic sunscreen preparations, sunscreen creams, sunscreen lotions, skin cleaner in the nature of sunscreen remover, after-sun lotions, cosmetics, deodorants, namely, personal deodorants, deodorants for body care, deodorant soap and deodorants for human beings, lip balms, liquid soap used in foot bath, non-medicated foot cream, foot scrubs, foot hydrating creams, hand creams, bath salts, nail polish removers, 3-in-1 hair shampoo, hair conditioner and body wash, hand soaps, non-medicated zinc diaper rash creams, body creams, face calendula creams, face creams, facial wash, pre-moistened cosmetic body wipes, pre-moistened cosmetic face wipes, pre-moistened cosmetic gel wipes, baby powder, body sprays, toothpaste, mouthwash, body powder, baby wipes; feminine care products, namely, wipes impregnated with a cleaning preparation; cotton balls and swabs for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes, hair oil, hair colour, hairspray, hair gel, hair wax, hair mousse, shaving cream, hair detangling preparations; body oils for fading stretch marks for use during pregnancy, cosmetic body gels for fading stretch marks for use during pregnancy, hydrating body lotions, body butter, body butter in the nature of a breast skin cream, non-medicated body soaks for the bath, bath salts, massage oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |