Drawing for LIGHTSPEED CAPITAL

USPTO serial 86672085

LIGHTSPEED CAPITAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGHTSPEED CAPITAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Lee Taylor

Jennifer Lee Taylor MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 Market StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation servicesACTIVE—
036Venture capital investment services; venture capital services, namely, providing financing to emerging and start-up companies; private equity investment services; private equity services, namely, financing services, structuring and participating in equity and debt financings, sourcing investments, identification of investors, advising on fund raising materials, identifying potential acquisitions and acquisition targets, advising on IPO planning and execution; investment banking services; raising and managing funds, namely, raising funds from institutional and individual investors and providing fund management services; capital investment services; publicly traded securities investment management services; financial management and administration of funds in the nature of investment funds and funds involving publicly traded securitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 24, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 28, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 30, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 1, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance