USPTO serial 86672329
MILKSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILKSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MOSHAV MESILAT ZION, IL
MOSHAV MESILAT ZION, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH GADOR
POB 4133GANEI TIKVA, 55900ISRAELGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Baby bottle sterilizers; baby bottle warmers; electric heaters for feeding bottles; sterilizers and parts and fittings thereof for baby bottle nipples, pacifiers, teething rings, cups, spouts for cups, handles for cups, feeding dishes and feeding utensils | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Infants' and children's drinking cups not of precious metals; Infants' and children's drinking bottles sold empty; attachments for infants' and children's drinking cups and bottles, namely, valves, lids, caps, holders, spouts and nipples; brushes for cleaning feeding equipment; baby and talcum powder dispensers; baby food containers sold empty; heat insulated containers for food and beverages; non-electric heaters for feeding bottles; tooth brushes; Bottles sold empty and containers for household use for warming, cleaning and sterilizing in microwave ovens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |