USPTO serial 86674218
E ENOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2019
- Examiner
- BATT, JAIME L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.
Need help with E ENOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Zender
Philip R. Zender SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP555 California Street, Suite 550SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | [ Financial consulting services, namely, advising others regarding their credit operations and collections activities; Financial credit modeling, namely, the evaluation of credit and other personal data as credit risk predictors; Business credit verification services; Credit scoring services; ] Loan servicing, namely, providing consumer credit consultation services, arranging and provision of loans, an interactive customer website featuring information in the field of consumer credit lending, and lending consultant services; Loan origination and preparation services; Arranging of loans; Financial loan consultation [ ; Financial analysis, namely, analyzing data for use in debt collection ] | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2017 |
| 042 | [ Cloud computing featuring software for use in predictive analytics and enterprise decision management in the field of consumer credit lending; Providing temporary use of web-based software applications for predictive analytics and enterprise decision management services relating to the credit modeling and collections activities of others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others, to further enterprise decision management in the field of consumer lending and collections; Design and development of computer software for use in enterprise decision management, predictive analytics, credit decisioning, credit modeling and collections, excluding software used primarily for product data management and product lifecycle management and optimizing the product design, development, and manufacturing processes; Data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect consumer credit and financial data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of consumer financial services and personal loans; Design and development of software for the automation of financial verification processes; software as a service, namely, hosting software for use by others featuring credit decision modeling ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 7, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CNU Online Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CNU Online Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CNU Online Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named E ENOVA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |