Drawing for MURMURATION

USPTO serial 86676051

MURMURATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MURMURATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price

ANDREW D. PRICE VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and platforms to evaluate, analyze and modify provided voter data, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making; computer software and platforms to evaluate, analyze and modify provided voter data in a geospatial visualization environment over maps, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision makingACTIVE—
035Providing online searchable databases featuring voter information for use in political campaigns, elections, and decision making; charitable services, namely, promoting education reform by coordinating the creation a network of financial donors for the purpose of matching donors with nonprofit organizations and causes in the field of education reformACTIVE—
042data warehousing in the field of voter data for political purposes; data provision services using proprietary software to evaluate and analyze provided voter data, for use in political campaigns, elections and political decision making, with the results of such evaluation and analysis provided via electronic spreadsheets; data automation services using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and modify provided voter data, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making, with the results of such evaluation and analysis provided via the Internet; platform as a service (PAAS) and software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software and platforms to evaluate, analyze and modify provided voter data, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making, with the results of such evaluation, analysis and modifications provided via the Internet; platform as a service (PAAS) and software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software and platforms featuring computer platforms to evaluate, analyze and modify voter data in a geospatial visualization environment over maps, for use in political campaigns, elections and decision making, with the results of such evaluation, analysis and modifications provided via the InternetACTIVE—
045Providing information, an online database, and information clearinghouse in the field of education reform featuring voter data information to education reform groups for the purpose of supporting issue advocacy in the field of education reform; services to support and advance education reform, namely, compilation and conducting analysis of individual voter data for education reform groups to support issue advocacy in the field of education reformACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 4, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance