USPTO serial 86676072
ONETOOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONETOOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
CATHERINE J. HOLLAND Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear Llp2040 Main St Fl 14Irvine, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing an online portal featuring entertainment news, video and information in the fields of sports and fantasy sports via global or local computer networks, geo-specific locations, desktop computers and portable or wireless devices; Providing online news, data, information, articles, predictive modeling, statistics, advice and analysis in the field of sports, fantasy sports, virtual sports, sports figures, sports events, sports leagues, teams, athletes, participants, rankings, scores, sports predictions; Entertainment services, namely, providing online interactive, computer, video and electronic games; entertainment services in the nature of fantasy sports; Entertainment services, namely, providing online interactive, computer, video and electronic games, fantasy sports, tournaments, leagues, social games, skill games, promotions, sweepstakes and contests; providing online interactive, computer, video and electronic games via a global computer network and in mobile wireless form; Entertainment services, namely, providing online interactive, computer, video and electronic games, fantasy sports, tournaments, leagues, social games, skill games, promotions, sweepstakes and contests via global or local computer networks, geo-specific locations, desktop computers and portable or wireless devices; Entertainment services, namely, providing an online virtual environment for games, fantasy sports, tournaments, leagues, social games, skill games, promotions, sweepstakes and contests; Providing games, fantasy sports, tournaments, leagues, social games, skill games, promotions, sweepstakes and contests for use network-wide by network users; Providing online games based on simulated securities exchanges or markets for trading in fantasy and virtual entertainment securities; Providing online games, fantasy sports, tournaments, leagues, social games, skill games, promotions, sweepstakes and contests for trading in fantasy or virtual sports; Providing ecommerce of products and services by members to members for sports memorabilia and sports products; Providing ticket sales of sports events and games; Providing a website for online gambling for sports events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |