USPTO serial 86676557
FUSIONEERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSENBLATT, ANNA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUSIONEERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Hoyd
CHRISTOPHER HOYD Potts Blacklock Pllc2901 Bee Caves Rd Ste HAustin, TX 78746-5570UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website and blog featuring the outcomes and products that result from individuals combining distinct subjects, disciplines, and schools of thought; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website and blog featuring art and artists; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website and blog featuring technology; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website and blog featuring robotics; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website and blog featuring the combination of robotics and painting; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website and blog featuring the artistic outcomes that result from individuals combining distinct fields of thought, study, and expertise; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website and blog featuring the creative process that results from individuals combining distinct fields of thought, study and expertise | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting workshops on the outcomes and products that result from individuals combining distinct subjects, disciplines and schools of thought, and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting workshops on the process of individuals combining distinct subjects, disciplines and schools of thought, and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting workshops in the field of art and artists, and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting workshops in the field of technology, and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting workshops in the field of robotics, and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting workshops on the combination of robotics and painting, and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting workshops on the artistic outcomes that result from individuals combining distinct fields of thought, study, and expertise, and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting workshops on the creative process that result from individuals combining distinct fields of thought, study, and expertise, and distribution of educational materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Kirby Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by The Kirby Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FUSIONEERING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |