USPTO serial 86676618
SCOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London NW2 7HF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy H. Hiebert
TIMOTHY H. HIEBERT Samuels & Hiebert Llc2 International Pl Fl 23Boston, MA 02110-4106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video cameras; Video cameras capable of transmitting images, sound and data wirelessly and through computer networks; Video cameras for use in monitoring the status and location of animals, individuals, animate objects or inanimate objects; Video cameras intended for use with software for remote monitoring of images, sound and data; Video cameras capable of infrared night vision; Pet monitors; GPS tracking devices for tracking and locating animals, individuals, animate objects or inanimate objects; Computer software for use in operating electronic tracking devices; Electronic displays, namely, pet viewing units; Parts, fittings and accessories for all the aforesaid goods, namely, electrical cables and batteries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |