USPTO serial 86679117
LIFELINE AMBULANCE SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARER, KATERINA DOROTHY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFELINE AMBULANCE SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Colletti,
ROBERT COLLETTI FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Ambulance transport; Medical transport services; all the foregoing specifically excluding transport by helicopter or fixed wing service | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |