Drawing for ART INNOVATIONS BRINGING IDEAS TO LIFE

USPTO serial 86679135

ART INNOVATIONS BRINGING IDEAS TO LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ART INNOVATIONS BRINGING IDEAS TO LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

WILLIAM C. WRIGHT Epstein Drangel Llp60 E 42nd St Ste 2410New York, NY 10165-0011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Scientific and technological services, namely, publishing and issuing scientific papers in relation to medical technologyACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services in the field of infertility treatment and fertility disorders; Scientific and technological services in the field of infertility treatment and fertility disorders, namely, clinical trials, research and development of new products for others, scientific research, scientific laboratory servicesACTIVE—
044Medical care and medical analysis services relating to the field of infertility treatment and fertility disordersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 4, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 4, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 9, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 20, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance