USPTO serial 86679153
SMARTIKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRATOS, MARK STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTIKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dorval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Brouillette
Robert Brouillette BROUILLETTE LEGAL INC.1050 COTE DU BEAVER HALL, SUITE 1500MONTREAL, QUEBEC, H2Z0A5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric light dimmers; thermostats; smoke detectors; flooding detectors; carbon monoxide detectors; light switches; power switches; electronic touch sensitive switches; video cameras; electronically-operated door latches; motion detectors; temperature sensors; environmental monitoring system comprised of meters and sensors that measure pressure, humidity, temperature and including alarm and reporting functions; pressure sensors; optical sensors; Electronic devices for environmental monitoring, control and automation; Home security system kit comprised of, namely, smoke detectors, flooding detectors and carbon monoxide detectors; Home and office automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, and software for lighting, HVAC, security, safety and other home and office monitoring and control applications; Home and office electrical power automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, and software for appliances, lighting, HVAC, security and other home and office electrical power monitoring and control applications; computer software for the sharing and transmission of data and information between electronic devices for the purposes of facilitating environmental monitoring, control, and automation; software for use on computers and hand-held devices to monitor and control, from a remote location, electronic devices for environmental monitoring, control, and automation; computer network hubs, switches and routers; Digital door locks, electric locks, electronic locks; Electromechanical controls for use with automated window shades, blinds and curtains; automated lighting controls; Electronic control systems for use with window shades, blinds and curtains systems, composed of electromechanical controls, electric control panels and computer hardware and computer software for adjusting window coverings; computerized window shading management and control apparatuses, namely, remote controls for electronic adjustment of window shades, blinds and curtains; Electronic control systems for controlling temperature, chlorine levels and PH levels in swimming pools and spas; video projectors; Downloadable video recordings featuring surveillance video recordings | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting fixtures; ceiling lights; wall lights; chandeliers; light bulbs; electric space heaters; air conditioners; Lawn sprinkler systems comprising pumps, valves and filters | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic message transmission | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |