USPTO serial 86679741
IDMCLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDMCLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kim Tran
KIM TRAN Perkins Coie Llp3150 Porter DrPalo Alto, CA 94304-1212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in computer, data, network and mobile device security, namely, computer software for protecting and securing the integrity of data, computer networks and mobile devices; computer software for providing authentication of users, and privacy control; computer software for managing data for virtualization and enterprise computing | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing secure, private, scalable, multiple user network interconnectivity to a network of remote servers hosted on the Internet to store, manage, and process data; telecommunications gateway services, namely, providing gateway links to connect enterprise networks to applications; providing third party users with access to a network of remote servers hosted on the Internet to store, manage, and process data; communications services, namely, providing third party users with access to a network of remote servers hosted on the Internet to design, develop, provide, and manage computing solutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a network of remote servers hosted on the Internet to store, manage, and process data featuring non-downloadable software for use in computer, data, network and mobile device security, namely, non-downloadable computer software for protecting and securing the integrity of data, computer networks and mobile device; consulting services in the field of computing and computer security; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in computer, data, network and mobile device security, namely, computer software for protecting and securing the integrity of data, computer networks and mobile devices; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in computer, data, network and mobile device security, namely, computer software for protecting and securing the integrity of data, computer networks and mobile device; infrastructure as a service (IAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in computer, data, network and mobile device security, namely, computer software for protecting and securing the integrity of data, computer networks and mobile device; computer consultation in the field of computer security; website protection services, namely, monitoring and on-line detecting of vulnerabilities, malware, viruses, and other data compromise and code infections on computers and electronic devices; designing, developing, and managing computing solutions systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |