Drawing for SWIFT-X

USPTO serial 86680113

SWIFT-X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWIFT-X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Speiss, III

Thomas J. Speiss, III BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1000 Wilshire Blvd.Suite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles, namely, automobiles; aerodynamic vehicles; race cars; rolling chassis for race cars; parts for race cars, namely, bare chassis, suspensions, steering units, and body parts; light aircraft; jet aircraft; structural parts for automobiles; structural parts for aircraft; automobile exterior parts made from carbon fiber composites; composite parts and assemblies for aircraft and other aerodynamic vehiclesACTIVE—
042Engineering services; mechanical engineering; research relating to mechanical engineering; product development and engineering services for others; computer-aided engineering services for others; consultation and research in the field of aerospace engineering; consulting in the field of engineering; engineering design services; engineering drawings servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 24, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 18, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 22, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 24, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 10, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 10, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 9, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 13, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 13, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2015UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Oct 16, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance