USPTO serial 86681382
WELLTHFOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WELLTHFOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allison Strickland Ricketts
Allison Strickland Ricketts Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Jams, vegetable preserves; fruit and nuts, all being preserved, dried or cooked; nut butters, butter spreads, potato crisps, dried vegetables, preserved vegetables, dried milk powder; yoghurt, rennet, edible oils, edible fats; Fruit-based snack food, vegetable-based snack food, preparations for making soups and fruit spreads, Meat, fish, poultry and game; vegetable preparations for use as substitutes for meat, namely, formed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute; Nut-based milk for use as a milk substitute; rice milk for use as a milk substitute; cheese, dairy and non-dairy butters; cream; tofu; eggs; preserved, dried, cooked, frozen or otherwise prepared vegetables and fruits; Cooked sea vegetables; edible oils and edible fats; jellies, jams, Fruit preserves; fruit and vegetable purees; prepared nuts; all being organically grown or being made principally from ingredients which are organically grown; soups | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flour bread mixes; bread meal and cereals, all for food for human consumption, namely, processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; bran products, namely, ready to eat cereals and ready to eat cereal-derived food bars, rice, sugar, natural sweeteners, biscuits, cakes, tea, honey, coffee, coffee essences, coffee extracts, mixtures of coffee and chicory; chicory and chicory mixtures, all for use as substitutes for coffee; pepper, seasonings other than essential oils, dried culinary herbs, non-medicated confectionery made of sugar, non-medicated confectionery made of sugar substitutes; Cereal-based snack foods, grain-based snack foods and rice-based snack foods, Bakery desserts and Cocoa spreads; Coffee and coffee substitutes; carob powder; tea and tea substitutes; condiments, namely chutneys and savory sauces used as a condiment and sauces; salt and salt substitutes; spices; vinegar; processed herbs; mustard; salad dressings; mayonnaise; sauces; Fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |