USPTO serial 86681631
SHERPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHERPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New South Wales, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. August
BRETT A. AUGUST Pattishall McAuliffe Newbury Hilliard & Geraldson200 S Wacker Dr Ste 2900Chicago, IL 60606-5896UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and application software for mobile phones and handheld computers, namely, software for placing and tracking orders of goods for local delivery or pick-up, as well as for communicating with the person delivering said goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Delivery of goods and documents in a predetermined time period, arranged via downloadable computer software and application software for mobile phones and handheld computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |