Drawing for SILKING

USPTO serial 86682338

SILKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; Automobile wheel cleaning brushes; Basting brushes; Bath brushes; Bath products, namely, body sponges; Bath products, namely, loofah sponges; Bath products, namely, natural sea sponges; Bath sponges; Bottle gourds; Cleaning sponges; Coffee cups, tea cups and mugs; Combs; Cosmetic brushes; Decorative crystal prisms; Dispensers for facial tissues; Drip mats for tea; Electric hair combs; Electric hot combs; Eyebrow brushes; Facial buffing pads; Facial cleansing sponges; Facial sponges for applying make-up; Hair combs; Japanese style tea-serving pots (kyusu); Kettles; Make-up brushes; Make-up removing appliances; Manual cosmetic cleaners, namely, non-woven fabric wipes and sponges; Non-electric kettles; Perfume bottles sold empty; Perfume burners; Perfume sprayers sold empty; Sponges used for applying make-up; Steamer baskets; Tea kettles; Tea pots; Tea sets; Whistling kettlesACTIVEJan 1, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2016PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 24, 2016PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 21, 2016PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 11, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2015DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance