USPTO serial 86682338
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; Automobile wheel cleaning brushes; Basting brushes; Bath brushes; Bath products, namely, body sponges; Bath products, namely, loofah sponges; Bath products, namely, natural sea sponges; Bath sponges; Bottle gourds; Cleaning sponges; Coffee cups, tea cups and mugs; Combs; Cosmetic brushes; Decorative crystal prisms; Dispensers for facial tissues; Drip mats for tea; Electric hair combs; Electric hot combs; Eyebrow brushes; Facial buffing pads; Facial cleansing sponges; Facial sponges for applying make-up; Hair combs; Japanese style tea-serving pots (kyusu); Kettles; Make-up brushes; Make-up removing appliances; Manual cosmetic cleaners, namely, non-woven fabric wipes and sponges; Non-electric kettles; Perfume bottles sold empty; Perfume burners; Perfume sprayers sold empty; Sponges used for applying make-up; Steamer baskets; Tea kettles; Tea pots; Tea sets; Whistling kettles | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2012 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2016 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |