USPTO serial 86683349
MULAN V BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULAN V BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben McLane
BEN MCLANE MCLANE & WONG11135 WEDDINGTON STAPT 424NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91601-3270Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; body and beauty care cosmetics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |