USPTO serial 86683621
OPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Zielona Gora, PL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Szymon Gurda
SZYMON GURDA Cherskov Flaynik & Gurda Llc123 W Madison St Ste 400Chicago, IL 60602-4629UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Volatile alkali used as detergent for household use; detergent soap for brightening textile; detergents other than those used in manufacturing operations and for medical use; bluing for laundry; soaps for household use and disinfectant soap; polishing preparations as well as polishing creams and polishing wax; anti-static preparations for household use; smoothing products in the nature of laundry starch; greasers other than for use in manufacturing processes, namely, degreasing preparations for household use; dry cleaning preparations and dry cleaning liquid; tableware washing, rinsing, freshening and scenting products, namely, dish detergents, rinse agents for dishwashing machines; sachets for perfuming linen; washing soda, namely, preparation for cleaning; bleaching soda; cloths impregnated with a detergent for cleaning; Laundry pre-soak; scouring solutions; bleaching salts; fabric softeners for laundry use; Drying agents for dishwashing machines; air fragrances; laundry wax; stain removers; laundry whiteners in the nature of laundry bleaching preparations; laundry detergents; laundry glaze; deodorants for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | air fresheners in the nature of air purifying preparations; deodorants for clothing or textiles; paper and moth-proofing products, namely, mothballs, mothproofing papers, anti-insect sprays for moths; germicides; germicides; Disinfectants for hygiene purposes; Disinfectant toilet bowl cleaners; air purifying products, namely, air purifying preparations, air deodorizing preparations; remedies for foot perspiration, namely, medicated foot powder | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |