USPTO serial 86683851
CLOUDPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2017
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CLOUDPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Fowler
Charles Fowler Glidewell Dental Ceramics Inc4141 MacArthur BlvdNewport Beach, CA 92660-2015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Three dimensional (3D) scanners; computer software and computer programs for generation of 3D production data; computer software that provides web-based access to applications and services through a web operating system or portal interface; computer-aided design (CAD) software for dental applications; computer software for 3D modeling, 3D visualization, and 3D analysis of anatomical data ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 23, 2015 |
| 035 | [ Commercial assistance in business management in the nature of computerized tracking of dental restorations in transit through the manufacturing process to ensure on-time delivery; business management for others in the field of dental restoration ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 23, 2015 |
| 040 | [ 3D analysis in the field of dental restorations, namely, analysis related to the custom manufacture of dental prosthetics for use in dental restoration; dental restoration manufacturing services, namely, custom manufacture of dental prosthetics ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 23, 2015 |
| 042 | Dental restoration design services; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for computer aided design (CAD), for use in the field of dental restoration design; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) management for use in the field of dental restoration manufacturing; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for tracking and managing the process of designing and manufacturing dental restorations; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for dental restoration design; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), for use in the field of dental restoration manufacturing; providing a secured access, members only website featuring technology that gives registered internet networked dental professionals the ability to communicate and share data for the purpose of designing and manufacturing dental restorations; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting problems with computer software and online software as a service (SAAS) services via telephone, email, and other means | ACTIVE | Apr 23, 2015 |
| 044 | [ 3D analysis in the field of dental restorative procedures ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 23, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CLOUDPOINT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |