USPTO serial 86683865
CARRIAGE HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARRIAGE HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint John, NB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD Merchant & Gould P CPO Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | wood shavings and wood pellets for large animal beds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |