Drawing for MASTERS OF TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 86687106

MASTERS OF TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERS OF TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Geissler

MARTIN R. GEISSLER Muncy Geissler Olds & Lowe P C4000 Legato Rd Ste 310Fairfax, VA 22033-2898UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water supply equipment, sanitary installations and sanitary fittings, namely, faucets, hot water/cold water mixer faucets for water pipes, automatic faucets, self-closing water faucets, thermostat and non-contact controlled faucets, tub parts in the nature of bath drains and tub overflows, taps for washstands, bath tubs, showers, bidets, showerheads and components thereof, shower head sprayers, hand showers, overhead showers, shower mixing valves, massage showers, holders for shower heads, holders for hand held showers, shower panels, shower columns being parts of showers, shower and bath cubicles and spray nozzles and spray heads for the aforesaid goods; hot/cold water mixer plumbing fittings, namely, mixer faucets for water pipes; digital fittings, namely, digital faucets; fittings that can be operated with a single touch, namely, faucets, flush levers; plumbing fittings, namely, bath drains; water run-off and overflow fittings, namely, plumbing drains, strainers for plumbing drains; self-closing water fittings, namely, flushometer valves, manually operated plumbing valves; shower plumbing fittings, namely, shower control valves; holders, tubes and tube connections for the aforesaid showers, namely, shower trays, plumbing couplers and flexible pipes being parts of shower plumbing installations; shower basins being parts of sanitary installations; electronically controlled self-closing shower-taps, including the aforesaid water supply and sanitary plumbing fittings being thermostat and/or non-contact controlled fittings, namely, shower and bath units sold together with faucets and plumbing valves taps for sink units; water mixers and plumbing fittings, namely, shower mixing valves, pressure-reducing taps, shutter valves, and water inlets and outlets being sanitary fittings; water softening units; sanitary furnishings, namely, hand wash basins, baths, bath tubs for seated baths; parts for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 26, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 26, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 22, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2017AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 16, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2017AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 27, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 26, 2017EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 18, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 18, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 11, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance