USPTO serial 86687325
DESIGN WITH CONFIDENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DESIGN WITH CONFIDENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent Capehart
Brent Capehart PALMER IP704-1478 WEST HASTINGS STREETVANCOUVER, BC, V6G3J6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software applications for project management, civil engineering and computer aided design for use in airport planning, design, and operations; Computer software consisting of movement simulation for vehicles and ground maneuvering aircraft; Computer software for designing a geometric shape using a vehicle's movement or path on a proposed road; Computer software for design of vehicle parking facilities; Computer software for designing roundabouts; Computer software program for automating the process of designing roadway signs; Computer software for the purpose of designing signalized intersections; Software for project management and civil engineering for use in conducting site impact analysis; Software applications for temporary use of downloadable software for project management and civil engineering for use in conducting site impact analysis; On-line software applications for generation of land use trips and traffic impact analyses; Computer software for engineering design, transportation, traffic, and infrastructure planning and design; Computer software for the collection, analysis, and reporting of traffic information relating to traffic data; Computer software for the collection, analysis, and reporting of traffic information relating to software for use in rail design and analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Training materials, namely, printed and electronic manuals, workbooks, study guides, brochures, in the field of engineering design; Books, instruction pamphlets in the field of engineering design, transportation, traffic, and infrastructure planning and design; Manuals in the field of engineering design, transportation, traffic, and infrastructure planning and design; Guides and booklets in the field of engineering design, transportation, traffic, and infrastructure planning and design; Brochures in the field of engineering design, transportation, traffic, and infrastructure planning and design | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing webinar, online, and classroom training in the field of engineering design and distribution of course material in connection therewith; Web-based and live training in the field of transportation, traffic, and infrastructure planning and design; Web-based and live training in the field of engineering design | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for project management, civil engineering and computer aided design for use in airport planning, design, and operations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for movement simulation for vehicles and ground maneuvering aircraft; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for designing a geometric shape using a vehicle's movement or path on a proposed road; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for design of vehicle parking facilities; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for designing roundabouts; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for automating the process of designing roadway signs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the purpose of designing signalized intersections; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the purpose of project management and civil engineering for use in conducting site impact analysis; Providing a website featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for project management, and civil engineering for use in conducting site impact analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generation of land use trips and traffic impact analyses; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for engineering design, transportation, traffic, and infrastructure planning and design; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the collection, analysis, and reporting relating to traffic data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the collection, analysis, and reporting of traffic information for use in software for rail design and analysis; Project support services, namely, providing assistance to others on specialized drawings and simulations in the area of design engineering; Providing technical support for software products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Transoft Solutions Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Transoft Solutions Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DESIGN WITH CONFIDENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |