USPTO serial 86687482
THE VINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE VINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Manhasset, NY
Manhasset, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Fields
PETER FIELDS Ritholz Levy Sanders Chidekel & Fields Llp235 Park Ave S Fl 3New York, NY 10003-1405UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Artichoke sauce; Barbecue sauce; Cheese sauce; Chutneys; Cocktail sauces; Cooking sauces; Dipping sauces; Dried pasta; Filled pasta; Food flavorings and seasonings; Fresh pasta; Honey mustard sauce; Hot sauce; Ketchup; Macaroni salad; Mustard; Packaged meal kits consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Pasta; Pasta and noodles; Pasta for soups; Pasta salad; Pasta sauce; Pizza; Pre-packaged lunches consisting primarily of rice, and also including meat, fish or vegetables; Prepared pasta; Ready-made sauces; Rice; Rice noodles; Rice salad; Salad dressings; Savory sauces used as condiments; Seasoning mixes; Seasoning mixes for soups; Steak sauce; Vinegar; Prepared, pre-packaged, frozen or ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |