Drawing for KUDDLY

USPTO serial 86688000

KUDDLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KUDDLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rose Hickman Rigole

ROSE HICKMAN RIGOLE Strategy Ip A Professional Law Corporation2372 Morse Ave Ste 326Irvine, CA 92614-6234UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and consulting services for the health care industry, namely, customer service, accounting services, and web-based advertising and marketing services; Business services provided to a network of health care providers, namely, the negotiation and execution of contracts with health care payors; Maintaining a registry of veterinary providers via an online market place platform connecting veterinarians and consumers for everyday veterinary concernsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 11, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 19, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance