Drawing for PERFECTLY FREE

USPTO serial 86688341

PERFECTLY FREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECTLY FREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jared M. Barrett

JARED M BARRETT SEED IP LAW GROUP LLP701 5TH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104-7064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fruit purees individually encapsulated in an edible membrane; all relating to products that are explicitly sold, offered or promoted as being free or substantially free from one or more allergens; in International Class 29ACTIVE—
030Foodstuffs, namely, frozen yogurts and ice creams individually encapsulated in an edible membrane; all relating to products that are explicitly sold, offered or promoted as being free or substantially free from one or more allergens; in International Class 30ACTIVE—
032Foodstuffs, namely, edible spheres containing flavored water, fruit juices, non-alcoholic fruit extracts, soft drinks; all relating to products that are explicitly sold, offered or promoted as being free or substantially free from one or more allergens; in International Class 32ACTIVE—
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, spirits and liquors, pre-mixed alcohol beverages, and cocktails all encapsulated in an edible membrane; all relating to products that are explicitly sold, offered or promoted as being free or substantially free from one or more allergens; in International Class 33ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 28, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Feb 13, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 21, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 10, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 23, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 23, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 4, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 29, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 28, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance