USPTO serial 86688593
SAFETRAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFETRAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd C. Basile
TODD C. BASILE Greenberg Traurig Llp1 International PlBoston, MA 02110-2602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices for monitoring and reporting the location and movements of persons using radio frequency, near-field communication, wireless communications, cellular communication networks, global positioning systems and satellite technology; wearable devices for wirelessly communicating the location and movements of persons using radio frequency, near-field communication, wireless communications, cellular communication networks, global positioning systems and satellite technology; sensors for determining the presence, proximity, geographic location, and movement of persons; proximity sensors and cameras for monitoring the physical access points of homes, schools and other facilities; radio transmitters, receivers, and transceivers; electrical and electronic connectors, couplers, wires, cables, chargers, docks, docking stations, interfaces, and adapters for use with all the aforementioned goods; computer software application for mobile phones and computers, namely, software for creating groups, location tracking, managing communications, and providing information to users in the field of monitoring and reporting the location and movements of persons; all of the aforementioned goods excluding goods relating to GPS vehicle tracking and patient monitoring within a health care facility | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of hardware and software that are designed for monitoring and reporting information concerning the location and movements of persons; development of mobile application software for coordinating a response to an event concerning the safety, location and movements of persons | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Consulting services in the field of personal safety, location monitoring and response, namely, consultation in the field of locating and monitoring the movements of seniors, young children, and those with special needs; emergency response alert monitoring services, namely, monitoring of alert devices by a remote monitoring center for the notification, coordination and dispatch of emergency responders or other third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Group Care Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Group Care Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SAFETRAX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |