Drawing for THE SHERIFF TO FIX AMERICA MARY JANE DECARLO

USPTO serial 86688972

THE SHERIFF TO FIX AMERICA MARY JANE DECARLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE SHERIFF TO FIX AMERICA MARY JANE DECARLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ralph P Albrecht

RALPH P ALBRECHT ATFirm PLLC3101 White Peach PlaceATFirm PLLC/Attn: Ralph P. AlbrechtFairfax, VA 22031

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009digital publications, namely, downloadable publications in the nature of books, magazines, brochures, articles and/or journals in the field of democratic and constitutional principles and the solutions to corrupted governance via candidacies for office as an elected officialACTIVEOct 15, 2015
016printed publications, in the nature of publications in the nature of books, magazines, brochures, articles and/or journals in the field of democratic and constitutional principles and the solutions to corrupted governance via candidacies for office as an elected officialACTIVEOct 15, 2015
041Education and entertainment services, namely, providing educational speakers related to democratic and constitutional principles and the solutions to corrupted governance via candidacies for office, as an elected official, digital publications, namely, providing non-downloadable publications in the nature of books, magazines, articles, brochures, journals in the field of democratic and constitutional principles and the solutions to corrupted governance via candidacies for office as an elected official; entertainment services, namely,audio and video production of multimedia entertainment content; providing commentary in the field of current events in the field of democratic and constitutional principles and the solutions to corrupted governance via candidacies for office as an elected official; education services, namely, providing panel discussions in the field of democratic and constitutional principles and the solutions to corrupted governance via candidacies for office as an elected official; providing online interviews featuring politicians in the field of current events regarding democratic and constitutional principles and the solutions to corrupted governance via candidacies for office as an elected official for entertainment purposesACTIVEOct 15, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2018MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Mar 29, 2018ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Mar 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 12, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2017CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 17, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 22, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 22, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 26, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 18, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 10, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 21, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance