USPTO serial 86690479
LEEZEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEEZEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Taipei, Taiwan, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor Wu
VICTOR WU Law Offices Of Victor WuPO Box 3188Ontario, CA 91761-0919UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Incense stick, incense powder | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Lactobacillus beverage, rice and peanut milk; tofu pudding; soybean milk, ginger jam; edible oils; edible fats (vegetable oil for cooking); fruit jellies; dried vegetables; frozen vegetables; dyhydrate fruit and vegetable; frosted fruits and vegetable; pickled vegetables; instant vegetable meal; vegetable soup; adzuki bean soup; green bean soup; peanut soup; fruit spreads and vegetable spreads; diary spreads; tofu; dried tofu; imitation meat, artificial meat; instant artificial meat meal; vegetarian condensed soup | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea leaf; tea-based beverages; coco-based beverages; chocolate powder; coffee-based beverages; coco-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; ice, ice cream; salt, sauces, vinegar, condiments, spices; sugar, honey candy, rice cracker; biscuits, cereal crisp; toast, cakes, bread, hamburger; puddings, pudding powder; pastries; steamed buns, red bean paste; green onion pancake, soybean pancakes; rice, barley, flour, cereal powder, grain powder, multi-grain fiber powder; tapioca rice ball; sago; congee; rice, rice tube pudding; instant noodles; shaved noodles; vegetarian noodles; noodles; dumpling; wonton | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | aerated water; fruit juices; mineral water; mixed vegetable juice; herbal tea; herbal tea bag; ginger soups; ginger tee powder, ginger tea bag; ginger tea; rice vinegar; bird's nest drink; seaweed beverages; hot grass jelly; healthy vinegar; honey vinegar; fruit vinegar | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leezen Company Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named LEEZEN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |