Drawing for TAEGIS

USPTO serial 86690899

TAEGIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAEGIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela C. Wilcox

ANGELA C. WILCOX Vanek Vickers and Masini Pc55 W Monroe St Fl 35Chicago, IL 60603-5001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Transportation logistics services, namely, arranging the transportation of computer hardware and peripherals for othersACTIVE—
037Information technology maintenance, refreshing and upgrading services, namely, installation , maintenance and repair of computer hardware and peripherals and information technology warranty repair of computer hardware and peripheralsACTIVE—
040Data destruction services, namely, hard drive destruction services; computer hardware recycling servicesACTIVE—
042Information technology engineering, information technology support, maintenance, refreshing and upgrading services, namely, installation, repair and maintenance of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 6, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2016PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 16, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 20, 2016TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 2, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 13, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance