USPTO serial 86693221
HONEYFILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALES, HEATHER ALISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HONEYFILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alexandria, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randolph E. Digges, III
Randolph E. Digges, III Rankin, Hill & Clark LLP23755 Lorain Road, Suite 200North Olmsted, OH 44070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software platforms for use in the field of computer network security that assist in the tracking of data exfiltration and network intelligence | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 2015 |
| 042 | Computer security consultancy; Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials; Computer virus protection services; Design and development of electronic data security systems; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in the field of computer network security that assist in the tracking of data exfiltration and network intellegence | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 30, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |