USPTO serial 86694331
MIGHTY GOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2019
- Examiner
- CASTRO,GIANCARLO
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with MIGHTY GOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WOODLAND, CA
South San Francisco, CA
WOODLAND, CA
Woodland, CA
WOODLAND, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S. Berman, Esq.
Rod S. Berman, Esq. Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90067United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, namely, packaged meals and packaged entrees consisting primarily of vegetables or legumes; soup mixes; packaged soups; soups, namely, bean soups; mixtures, namely, processed legume mixtures; packaged foods, namely, processed edible seeds; soy-based snack foods; packaged entrees consisting primarily of soy-based foods and vegetable-based foods; processed plants used for food purposes, namely, processed soy beans | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 2019 |
| 030 | Food products, namely, packaged meals and entrees consisting primarily of pasta, noodles, rice, namely, brown rice, or processed grains, namely, farro, spelt, and quinoa; packaged meal kits, namely, kits consisting primarily of pasta, noodles, rice, namely, brown rice, or processed grains, namely, farro, spelt, and quinoa; food products, namely, breakfast cereals, processed cereals, processed herbs and processed grains; sauces, namely, pasta sauce, and grain sauce; noodles; pasta; rice; oatmeal; spices; seasoning; processed, dried and preserved herbs; processed plants used for food purposes, namely, soy bean paste; salads, namely, pasta salads; rice salads, namely, brown rice salads and wild rice salads; and processed grains salads, namely, farro salads, spelt salads, and quinoa salads | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRIGHT PEOPLE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Bright People Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BRIGHT PEOPLE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Bright People Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BPF SUBSIDIARY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MIGHTY GOOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |