USPTO serial 86695760
BIO PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 2020
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BIO PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval, QUEBEC, CA
Laval, QUEBEC, CA
Laval, QUEBEC, CA
LUXEMBOURG L-1820, LU
KERRY GROUP SERVICES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
TRALEE CO. KERRY, IE
Other trademarks owned by KERRY GROUP SERVICES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody H. Drake
Jody H. Drake Sughrue Mion, PLLC2000 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900Washington, DC 20006-1811UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, malted milk based beverages for medical purposes; Symbiotic, prebiotic and probiotic functional foods and nutritional supplements, namely, beverages made of a blend of probiotic strains using carriers containing soya or rice solids in the nature of probiotic supplements; Probiotic products, namely, preparations in the nature of milk based, soya based and rice based beverages made up of bacteria for promoting health and wellness in the nature of probiotic supplements; Preparations made up of ferments, namely, probiotic bacteria preparations in the nature of milk based, soya based and rice based beverages for the prevention and treatment of constipation, bloating, diarrhea, and similar digestive system conditions, namely, digestive tract conditions or gastrointestinal disorders; Preparations in the nature of milk based, soya based and rice based beverages containing probiotic bacteria for the prevention and treatment of the digestive system; all the foregoing for human consumption only | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIO-K PLUS INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BIO-K PLUS INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BIO-K PLUS INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KERRY LUXEMBOURG S.À.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by KERRY GROUP SERVICES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named BIO PLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2020 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 11, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 11, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |