USPTO serial 86696276
CARVELA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HISER, CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARVELA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin P. Welch
DENIS V SHAMO BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP2001 ROSS AVENUE2300 TRAMMEL CROW CENTERDALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewellery; clocks and watches; cuff-links; buckles for watchstraps; precious stones; precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, works of art of precious metals; horological and chronometric instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail, mail order and online retail services in the field of footwear, shoes, sandals, slippers, sunglasses, spectacles, cases for sunglasses and spectacles, frames for sunglasses and spectacles, contact lenses, containers for contact lenses, jewellery and precious stones, clocks, watches, cufflinks, belts for clothing, belt buckles, horological and chronometric instruments, attaché cases, suitcases, briefcases, briefcase-type portfolios, key cases, purses, wallets, credit card holders, covers and cases for tablet computers and mobile phones, shoulder bags, rucksacks, backpacks, vanity cases sold empty, cosmetic cases sold empty, and carry-on bags, luggage, travelling trunks, travelling bags, handbags, umbrellas, parasols, walking sticks, scarves, gloves, beauty and personal care products, cosmetics, perfumes, fragrances, headgear, hats, caps and clothing; advertising and promotional services; providing and conducting sales incentive programs to promote the sale of products and services of others; customer loyalty services and customer club services, for commercial, promotional, and/or advertising purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |