USPTO serial 86697190
CAPTIVATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAPTIVATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bayview Flowers (Jordan Station) Ltd.
Jordan Station,Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Bayview Flowers (Jordan Station) Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan Gile
RYAN GILE Weide & Miller Ltd7251 W Lake Mead Blvd Ste 530Las Vegas, NV 89128-8373UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Live Potted Plants; Floral or plant arrangements with live or cut flowers or live plants or plant cuttings or combinations thereof; Cut Flowers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing information in the field of plant care with respect to live plants regarding the physical appearance, growth characteristics, origins, background, and lifespan of live plants, recommendations regarding the usage of live plants for gifts and décor, and on the care and maintenance of live plants, via a website on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |