USPTO serial 86698593
HOW WORK SHOULD WORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOW WORK SHOULD WORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joi A. White
JOI A. WHITE Carr & Ferrell LLP120 Constitution DrMenlo Park, CA 94025-1107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in gathering data, analyzing data, and providing recommendations in the field of business management; Computer software for use in planning, monitoring, analyzing, measuring, setting, tracking, reporting and optimizing individual goals and objectives and internal business team goals and objectives; Computer software for use in collecting, tracking, analyzing and reporting data to monitor, rate and assess individual performance and business team performance; Computer software for use in team collaboration; Computer software for use in providing team feedback and management analysis; Computer software for use in rating, analyzing and reporting effectiveness of team meetings; Computer software for use in meeting planning and optimization | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) for use in gathering data, analyzing data, and providing recommendations in the field of business management; Platform as a service (PAAS) for use in gathering data, analyzing data, and providing recommendations in the field of business management; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in gathering data, analyzing data, and providing recommendations in the field of business management; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in gathering data, analyzing data, and providing recommendations in the field of business management; Software as a service (SAAS) for use in planning, monitoring, analyzing, measuring, setting, tracking, reporting and optimizing individual and internal business team goals and objectives; Platform as a service (PAAS) for use in planning, monitoring, analyzing, measuring, setting, tracking, reporting and optimizing individual and internal business team goals and objectives; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in planning, monitoring, analyzing, measuring, setting, tracking, reporting and optimizing individual and internal business team goals and objectives; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in planning, monitoring, analyzing, measuring, setting, tracking, reporting and optimizing individual and internal business team goals and objectives; Software as a service (SAAS) for use in collecting, tracking, analyzing and reporting data to monitor, rate and assess individual performance and business team performance; Platform as a service (PAAS) for use in collecting, tracking, analyzing and reporting data to monitor, rate and assess individual performance and business team performance; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in collecting, tracking, analyzing and reporting data to monitor, rate and assess individual performance and business team performance; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in collecting, tracking, analyzing and reporting data to monitor, rate and assess individual performance and business team performance; Software as a service (SAAS) for use in team collaboration; Platform as a service (PAAS) for use in team collaboration; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in team collaboration; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in team collaboration; Software as a service (SAAS) for use in providing team feedback and management analysis; Platform as a service (PAAS) for use in providing team feedback and management analysis; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in providing team feedback and management analysis; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in providing team feedback and management analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) for use in rating, analyzing and reporting effectiveness of team meetings; Platform as a service (PAAS) for use in rating, analyzing and reporting effectiveness of team meetings; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in rating, analyzing and reporting effectiveness of team meetings; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in rating, analyzing and reporting effectiveness of team meetings; Software as a service (SAAS) for use in meeting planning and optimization; Platform as a service (PAAS) for use in meeting planning and optimization; Providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in meeting planning and optimization; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in meeting planning and optimization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLIGHTPATH HUMAN SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FLIGHTPATH HUMAN SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HOW WORK SHOULD WORK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |