USPTO serial 86701222
MAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABLE, ERIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirk M. Miles
KIRK M. MILES Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Blvd Ste 1200Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Construction materials, namely, floor panels made primarily from metal, for use in the construction of flooring, interlocking floor tiles, and modular flooring, featuring a liquid controlling surface; construction materials, namely, floor panels made primarily from metal, for use in the construction of flooring, interlocking floor tiles, and modular flooring; indoor/outdoor flooring made primarily from metal featuring liquid controlling surfaces; Metal construction mats for containing corrosive materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicle trunk organizers, namely, boot trays specially adapted for fitting in vehicles; fitted truck bed liners; mats for engine compartments of cars, trucks, and boats | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Construction materials, namely, non-metal floor panels made primarily from plastic, rubber, or synthetics for use in the construction of flooring, interlocking floor tiles, and modular flooring, which construction materials feature liquid controlling surfaces; construction materials, namely, non-metal floor panels made primarily from plastic, rubber, or synthetics for use in the construction of flooring, interlocking floor tiles, and modular flooring; indoor/outdoor flooring made primarily from plastic, rubber, or synthetics featuring liquid controlling surfaces; liquid controlling mats not of metal for use on pallets; Non-metal construction mats for containing corrosive materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Surface coverings, namely, vehicular mats made from metal, plastic, rubber, or synthetics, namely, floor mats for automobiles which feature a liquid controlling surface; surface coverings, namely, vehicular mats made from metal, plastic, rubber, or synthetics, namely, floor mats for automobiles which feature a liquid controlling surface and are linkable to form different sized mats; residential mats made from plastic, namely, plastic bath mats; indoor/outdoor floor mats; protective floor coverings, namely, surface mats for use while painting; floor mats for land, sea, and air vehicles; urinal mats, namely, bath mats; pet mats, namely, pet feeding mats and pet litter pan floor mats; residential mats made from plastic, namely, plastic floor mats; residential mats made from plastic, namely, plastic floor mats which feature a liquid controlling surface; residential mats made from plastic, namely, plastic floor mats which are linkable to form different sized mats; industrial floor mats made from plastic, rubber, or synthetics, namely, liquid containment and control mats which feature liquid controlling surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sanderson, James
- Other trademarks owned by Sanderson, James
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named MAZE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |