Drawing for TWENTYEIGHTY STRATEGY EXECUTION

USPTO serial 86701666

TWENTYEIGHTY STRATEGY EXECUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWENTYEIGHTY STRATEGY EXECUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Starshak

KATHRYN STARSHAK K&l Gates LlpPO Box 1135Chicago, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for training in the fields of project management, business analysis, business skills, and contract managementACTIVE—
016Printed publications, namely, training materials, instructional manuals, testing materials, books, newsletters, pamphlets and brochures in the fields of project management, business analysis, contract management, computer software management, and government relationsACTIVE—
035Consulting services in the field of business, public administration, and project management, namely, development of processes for the analysis and the implementation of strategy plans and management projectsACTIVE—
041Educational training services in the fields of project management, business analysis, contract management, computer software management, and government relationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 8, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 9, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 8, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance