USPTO serial 86701699
DJ KONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DJ KONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Willard A. Stanback
WILLARD A STANBACK WILLARD ALONZO STANBACK PC36 WEST LAFAYETTE STREETSUITE 103TRENTON, NJ 08608Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Audio recording and production; Disc jockeys for parties and special events; Music composition services; Production of sound recordings; Providing a database featuring information about artists; Providing on-line music, not downloadable | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |