USPTO serial 86704568
OWLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OWLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. SCOTT ALPRIN Alprin Law Offices P C5 Pinehurst Cir NWWashington, DC 20015-2441UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion detectors; Laser measuring systems; Laser object detectors for use on humans; Lasers for measuring motion; Lasers for measuring purposes; Cameras; Digital cameras; Computers; Computer software for detecting and measuring motion; Computer software for data collection based on the detection and measurement of motion; Software for processing images, graphics and text; Software for processing digital images of the anatomy for diagnosis and treatment; Computer monitors and motion detectors for detecting patient movement in hospitals | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Lasers for medical purposes; Medical imaging apparatus; Medical diagnostic apparatus for detecting swallowing disorders; Medical image processors; Medical imaging apparatus for diagnosing medical conditions; Computerized medical recording and analysis apparatus for the diagnosis of respiratory conditions; Patient monitoring sensors and alarms; Respiration monitors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 22, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |