Drawing for PIVOTPROTECT

USPTO serial 86707157

PIVOTPROTECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIVOTPROTECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew A. Poulsen

MATTHEW A POULSEN SUITER SWANTZ PC LLO14301 FNB PKWY STE 220OMAHA, NE 68154-5299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal center pivot irrigation system protection devices, namely fairing devices, covering devices, tubes, included in or attached to a portion of an irrigation system, namely an irrigation tube, a truss, and a wheel, to protect the irrigation system from environmental damage, namely wind damage, hail damage, and lightning damage, and theft, namely theft of copper wireACTIVE—
007Center pivot irrigation system protection machines, namely, gyro machines, included in or attached to a center pivot irrigation system, for stabilizing the center pivot irrigation system against wind, height control machines and orientation control machines, included in or attached to a center pivot irrigation system, to protect the center pivot irrigation system from environmental damage, namely, wind damage, hail damage, lightning damage and theft of copper wire; center pivot irrigation system comprising an irrigation tube, truss, and wheels; metal and non-metal center pivot irrigation protection machines for protecting a center pivot irrigation system; machine parts, namely, metal and non-metal center pivot irrigation system protection machine parts for protecting a center pivot irrigation system, namely, fairing devices, covering devices, tubes, included in or attached to a center pivot irrigation systemACTIVE—
019Non-metal center pivot irrigation system protection devices, namely fairing devices, covering devices, tubes, included in or attached to a portion of an irrigation system, namely an irrigation tube, a truss, and a wheel, to protect the irrigation system from environmental damage, namely wind damage, hail damage, and lightning damage, and theft, namely theft of copper wireACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 18, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 8, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 8, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 8, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance