USPTO serial 86708421
AIRBRUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2017
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AIRBRUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy T. Wang
Timothy T. Wang Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC8140 Walnut Hill Ln, Ste. 615DALLAS, TX 75231UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software applications for editing, manipulating, modifying, and sharing photograph, digital and graphic images; Recorded computer software for editing, manipulating, modifying, and sharing photograph, digital and graphic images [ ; Portable media players; Cameras; Laptop computers; Electronic tags for goods; Electronic notice boards; Television apparatus; Data processing apparatus; Smartphones; Tablet computers; Programs for computer games; Headphones; Chargers for electric batteries; Printers for use with computers; downloadable and recorded animated cartoons; 3D spectacles; Cellular phones; Camcorders ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Providing photo typesetting services provided via the Internet; Photocomposing services [ ; Photographic printing; Bookbinding; Paper treating; Photographic film development; Processing of Cinematographic films; Framing of art; Printing ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PIXOCIAL HONG KONG LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MEITU (CHINA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MEITU (CHINA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named AIRBRUSH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |