USPTO serial 86708713
TRUEPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUEPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood Shores, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
XAVIER MORALES
XAVIER MORALES Law Office Of Xavier MoralesPO Box 6510San Antonio, TX 78209-0510UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for use in payment calculation, calculating vendor and manufacturer financial exposure based on channel sales and inventory data, validating partner claims against calculated liability for a variety of outcome-based incentives, generating and viewing and sending payment notifications, viewing reports of financial exposure for incentives owed, viewing the status of payments or claims due, approving or disputing credits, creating and modeling and running channel partner incentive programs, and resolving payment disputes generated by claim discrepancies; Cloud computing featuring software for use in channel management; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for payment calculation, calculating vendor and manufacturer financial exposure based on channel sales and inventory data, validating partner claims against calculated liability for a variety of outcome-based incentives, generating and viewing and sending payment notifications, viewing reports of financial exposure for incentives owed, viewing the status of payments or claims due, approving or disputing credits, creating and modeling and running channel partner incentive programs, and resolving payment disputes generated by claim discrepancies; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for channel management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for payment calculation, calculating vendor and manufacturer financial exposure based on channel sales and inventory data, validating partner claims against calculated liability for a variety of outcome-based incentives, generating and viewing and sending payment notifications, viewing reports of financial exposure for incentives owed, viewing the status of payments or claims due, approving or disputing credits, creating and modeling and running channel partner incentive programs, and resolving payment disputes generated by claim discrepancies; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for channel management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |