USPTO serial 86709215
ICONZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 734Notice of Allowance
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
The USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance. To complete registration you generally need to file a Statement of Use or an extension request before the deadline.
Need help with ICONZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Notice of Allowance, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $224*
Plus Government fees of $125
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marijan Hucke
Marijan Hucke HUCKE & SANKER PLLC1632 1st Ave Ste 27500New York, NY 10028United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bed clothes, namely bed sheets, bed spreads and blankets; Pillowcases; Bed covers; Bed covers of paper; Traced cloths for embroidery; Wall hangings of textile; Curtains of plastic; Curtain fabric; Non-woven textile fabrics; Towels; Fitted toilet lid covers of fabric; Tablecloths, not of paper; Tablecloths, not of paper; Textile napkins; Tablecloths, not of paper; Handkerchiefs of textile; Fabrics for textile use; textile labels; Bed covers; Travelling Rugs; Place mats, not of paper; Mattress covers; table and bed linens; Curtains of textile or plastic; Shower curtains of textile or plastic; Cotton fabrics; Bath linen, except clothing; textile banners; Napkins, of cloth, for removing make-up; Pillowcases; Cot covers, namely, cot sheets; Covers for eiderdown and duvets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 30, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |